Search for: "People v. London"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
A libel claim arising by a governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust arising out of publications by another governor to a small number of people. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:09 pm
The case of Serafin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Guest Kat Eibhlin attended an important patent event hosted by UCL and IBIL (there were around 800 people attending!) [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 am
In Laine v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:35 pm
Alex Mills of University College London. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Although beneficial to huge numbers of people, many vaccines also may seriously harm a very small number of people who react adversely to the product. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Although beneficial to huge numbers of people, many vaccines also may seriously harm a very small number of people who react adversely to the product. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
The ICO has warned people working with sensitive personal information that they must obey strict privacy rules. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:11 am
In R v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
The Black Markets still out there In one episode of Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords that I was in last year we were shown going to a 2 bed flat with 23 people in it. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
