Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 621 - 640 of 5,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm by bndmorris
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Another #MAGA opinion from a Trump-appointed Federalist Society judge, and a full-throated work of Justice Thomas fandom. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In 2021, the Court heard the case Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Emma Svoboda outlined the issues at hand in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Ken Thomas reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Critical race scholars seek to speak truth to power, but mostly without advancing interpretive proposals that are claimed to “fit” the main outlines of existing practice. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Knight First Amendment Institute (2021) (Thomas, J., concurring) Lee C. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal has found that Police Scotland breached a journalist’s Article 10 rights when it sought to identify the Sunday Mail’s sources for an investigation into a failed murder inquiry. [read post]