Search for: "Read v. People" Results 621 - 640 of 21,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 11:29 am
  Not surprisingly, I read lots of cases about murders. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm
"  But he concludes:  "I've been struggling for some intellectually honest way to read that language and say it doesn't apply, and I can't find it. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
 (You can read more about this Columbine-like shooting in the opinion. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
--> Guest Post: Vasujith Ram Recently in Lily Thomas v Union of India, the Court held that Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA) was ultra vires the Constitution. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:24 pm by Jay Stanley
The documents the ACLU obtained make clear that, before Warshak, it was the policy of the IRS to read people’s email without getting a warrant. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
Monday’s decision can be read two different ways. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
“How would each of you have decided Loving v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Rorabaugh won a difficult case (he lost) or wrote an outstanding brief (since I've never read it, so I don't know one way or the other). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
Make sure that you're reading the statute right, and don't accidentally make arguments that go the wrong way. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
At least in my mind.So I was stunned when I read this case. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
" And, this, of course, is how they suggest Brown v Board of Education can be justified on an originalist basis even if the expected application of the 14th Amendment as a whole by the people at the time was that it allowed segregated schools. [read post]