Search for: "Rowe v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
City of New York, docket number 06-134, the court applied the FSIA exception of 27 USC §1605(a)(4) to rights in immovable property situated in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:27 pm
Supreme Court's decision (Cert denied 06-1410 Idaho -v- Estrada) to let the Estrada ruling stand could have widespread ramifications for Idaho, said state Deputy Attorney General Ken Jorgensen. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in Herrera v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
By contrast, use of its police forces for such a purpose would have enabled Peru to retain immunity from suit in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Kingdom sought review of the same issue in the recognition proceeding in the United States and lost when the United States District Court applied a deferential review. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Harris has been on death row for eighteen years, yet has chosen onlythis moment, with his execution imminent, to challengea procedure for lethal injection that the state has usedfor an even longer period of time. . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 am
White wrote for the majority in a 1977 case, Patterson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:48 am
In Ray v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
An exchange of notes that addresses many points of a future agreement between nations but is silent on certain aspects of the agreement cannot remove the unspoken matter from the realm of justiciable issues under the act of state and related doctrines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Eli Gross et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, and Buck v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
That is according to attorneys who have asked a state district court to delay his death. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm
So it was for the court’s ruling today in Ayestas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
App. 218 (1994), and State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 8:12 am
Panetti's case, Panetti v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:20 am
In the case of Snyder v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
Additional Resources: Kelter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So says the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Davis v. [read post]
