Search for: "Running v. Miller"
Results 621 - 640
of 971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
The case is called McCracken v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
In May v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm
It’s true that this quote is indeed what Justice Stewart is famous for, but people generally miss the follow-up to the quote: Nine years later Stewart joined the dissent in Miller v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part Two of the series, scheduled to run August 2, 2013, I will sketch out what I think Californians should do to properly and finally lay Proposition 8 fully to rest. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Miller, & M. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:18 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am
The court was faced with the question of whether the statute covered content that was obscene as defined by the Miller v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Carras v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Wikipedia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:08 am
SEC and Amgen v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
And yet who among us would deny that if the NBNP proposal had deferred compensation for 20 years if a budget was not passed by a certain deadline, such an approach would run afoul of the 27th Amendment? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Causation probably runs in both directions. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Heller in 2008, and McDonald v. [read post]
