Search for: "SMITH v. DAVIS" Results 621 - 640 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 9:33 am by michael
Supreme Court Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 (17 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harley & Ors v Smith & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 78 (17 February 2010) Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG [2010] EWCA Civ 82 (17 February 2010) Davies & Anor, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83 (16 February 2010) Virdi v The Law Society of England and Wales & Anor [2010]… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Hull & Hull LLP
  Sharon Davis:   And certainly that was the case in the Fiaco v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin Thompson, at Davis McGrath LLC in Chicago, practices primarily in the area of domestic and international trademarks, copyrights, and internet law issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin Thompson, at Davis McGrath LLC in Chicago, practices primarily in the area of domestic and international trademarks, copyrights, and internet law issues. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:23 pm by Lincoln W. Hobbs, Esq., CCAL
., lawyers from the New Jersey firm of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Davis, LLP.New Jersey, like Utah, has no cases specifically on associations' rights and abilities to amend to restrict rentals, although a case dealing with parking, ________, touches on the rights associated with property ownership.Woodside Village VIII Condo. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:18 am by Joe Mullin
Supreme Court made getting such an injunction in a patent case extremely difficult with its landmark eBay v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Beck, et al.
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Colorado law); Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am by Tessa Shepperson
July In July the decision is published in the OFT v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that allegedly render it noncompliant with 22 NYCRR 1215.1 do not bar defendants from recovering in quantum meruit (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-64 [2007]; see also Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [2008]). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:02 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
From Michael Smith's Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice Weblog:Last Thursday a Marshall jury in Judge Ward's court in Fiber Systems Int'l v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]