Search for: "Samuel Anthony Alito" Results 621 - 640 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2007, 2:00 pm
Alito, Jr., joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Samuel Alito dissented from today’s ruling, in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:41 pm
Then there's Justice Alito: Justice Samuel A. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
He had barely begun on that theme when Justice Samuel A. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  In 2006, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor – the author of the Court’s opinion in Grutter – retired and was succeeded by Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito agreed that new technology has raised new concerns, but he appeared less receptive to the idea of carving out an exception to the third-party doctrine. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:36 pm by Daniel Bussel
Justice Samuel Alito, picking up on procedural arguments made in Jevic’s merits briefing, suggested that by requesting a remedy that would revive the settled fraudulent transfer claims that could not practically be prosecuted, the workers were shifting their position both from what they had asserted before the court of appeals and from the question they had asked the court to review on certiorari, but Spinelli responded that the propriety of priority-deviating structured… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
” Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Alito, Jr., and Anthony M. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 11:53 am by Adam Feldman
Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch fall to the middle of this figure, while Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy were interrupted most frequently. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by Stephen McAllister
McWilliams chose the latter option, in a 5-4 decision, with Justice Anthony Kennedy joining the majority, and Roberts, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito and Gorsuch in dissent. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:51 pm by Douglas Berman
No doubt because the majority’s opinion in this case could be read to greatly ease a federal defendant’s burdens during plain-error review, Justice Samuel Alito dropped a lengthy footnote in his concurrence to warn lower courts against interpreting the Court’s opinion “as instructions . . . to side with the forfeiting defendant unless the Government can point to ‘unusual circumstances’. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm by Mark Walsh
A few minutes later, retired Justice Anthony Kennedy, whom Kavanaugh has succeeded, walks in while chatting with Martha-Ann Alito, the wife of Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am by Rich McHugh
In a short concurring opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy tried to reinforce the limited nature of this opinion. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
There was also this humorous, but pointed exchange between Verrilli and Justice Samuel Alito: JUSTICE ALITO: This statute has an enormous –an enormous breadth, anything that can cause death or injury to a person or an animal. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:22 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito, for example, suggested a similar rule:  an employer could tell an applicant that it has “a policy of ‘no beards’” and ask him whether he has “a problem with that. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
That concerned Justice Samuel Alito, a former U.S. attorney in New Jersey. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:15 pm by Kristen Clarke and Ezra Rosenberg
This is clear from the sum and substance of the majority opinions, and from the explicit language in the separate opinions of Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas in Bethune-Hill and that of Thomas in Cooper. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:17 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito acknowledged that the government’s proposed rule was a “sensible” one, but he wondered aloud why the government didn’t amend the forty-five-day regulation to make it clearer when the clock begins to run. [read post]