Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 2,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
The Supreme Court has other ways of shielding itself from such problems. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:33 am
This is thanks in part to the 2008 United States Supreme Court groundbreaking case, Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by Williams Oinonen LLC
This is thanks in part to the 2008 United States Supreme Court groundbreaking case, Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A few months ago, the Court of Appeals said that a man could sue the United States Attorney General for constitutional violations resulting from his restrictive detention on account of his ethnic background. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:26 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a showing of good cause was sufficient to support parties' requests to file documents under seal. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Ctr. forAuto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1096 (quoting United States v.Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)); see also ValleyBroad. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:25 pm
This, it’s likely that similar claims will continue to spring up in Illinois, Missouri and across the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 8:25 am by Lee E. Berlik
Here’s what happened, according to the facts stated in the opinion: Fidelis Agbapuruonwu immigrated to the United States from Nigeria, went to law school, and got a prestigious, high-paying job as an associate attorney at the law firm of Mayer Brown. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
A sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Alex Moss
United States Postal Service, the patent owner, Return Mail, demanded that the Postal Service pay it for a patent license. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States District Court, Southern District of New York, affirming an order of the magistrate judge, rejected the Members' claim that they were entitled to legislative immunity that protects them against being called as witnesses at depositions regardless of whether they are parties in the action and directed the Members to appear for their depositions. [read post]