Search for: "State v. Arnold" Results 621 - 640 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2008, 4:11 pm
The case now is pending before the Supreme Court under the name D.C. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am by stu@crimapp.com
Leach, Flyers Beware: The NInth Circuit Decision in United States v Arnold, Granted Customs Agents Access Into Your Laptops, 26 Cooley L Rev 307 (2009)(requires fee to access article). [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Justice Arnold courtesy of the US Copyright Office who is again reviewing the problem of orphan works. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
 The case is Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), yet another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
" Jameel Jaffer sums up the state of play in the ACLU's work to expose illegal surveillance. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:26 pm by Jim Walker
’s chairman, Micky Arison, and its president Arnold Donald, stating that she regretted not being able to send the executives to a few days in detention. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am by Dan Ernst
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]