Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals of Indiana" Results 621 - 640 of 3,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 10:38 am by Nassiri Law
The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont, while the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals includes areas of Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin.Californians are fortunate that the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act already includes “sexual orientation” among protected employee traits for employers of five or more. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
” He further stated that “No employer should be able to penalize its employees because of who they love,” and that the appeals court had affirmed that “fundamental right. [read post]
Pay to Play On appeal, the court assessed each of the factors the state relied on to determine whether they provided a nondiscriminatory basis for the difference in pay. [read post]
Pay to Play On appeal, the court assessed each of the factors the state relied on to determine whether they provided a nondiscriminatory basis for the difference in pay. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Nick Sibilla urges the justices to resolve the question whether the Constitution’s excessive-fines clause applies to the states by reviewing a case in which “the Indiana Supreme Court … ordered [a defendant] to forfeit his $40,000 Land Rover because he sold $385 worth of drugs. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Rush County Board of Zoning Appeals, (IN App., Jan. 16, 2018), an Indiana state appeals court rejected a challenge by a church summer camp to a zoning board decision granting a special exception to a dairy farm to operate a concentrated animal feeding operation one-half mile from the summer camp. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure which allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Campbell On January 2, 2018, State Attorneys General from eleven states (Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin) (collectively the States) filed a friend of the court brief in Nat’l Ass’n of Wheat Growers v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]