Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)" Results 621 - 640 of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm by Wolfgang Demino
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:06 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Brown, the Illinois Court of Appeal for the Fourth District held that whether an “act of God” occurs should be determined by the trier of fact. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:06 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Brown, the Illinois Court of Appeal for the Fourth District held that whether an “act of God” occurs should be determined by the trier of fact. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
On Monday, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
Notwithstanding racial isolation, voluntary plans became the only means to effectively achieve Brown's promise of equality in racially balanced schools.But on Thursday the Supreme Court hammered the final nail in the coffin of Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently released orders in bankruptcy and contract cases, among them: In Roling v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
No. 07-308, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm by Eric Citron
And the Supreme Court even held in 2005 in National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:25 pm by Jeff Brown
   The opinions don’t bind state courts, other federal district or appellate courts, or even other judges in her district. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
One reviewer of the episode wrote: Perry cites a real case, State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:02 am
  This decision, unless appealed, signals the end of the three years of civil class litigation spawned by then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's investigation of contingent commission arrangements in the insurance brokerage industry.Chief Judge Brown found that plaintiffs had failed to satisfy  Rule 8's  pleading standard, as recently re-articulated by the Supreme Court in the Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Specifically, applying the heightened pleading standard required by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]