Search for: "State v. J. A. H." Results 621 - 640 of 2,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
These state regulations never restricted their application to any particular industry. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
But having stated reasons for her decision, the judge issued a written judgment from this preliminary hearing. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:28 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
The appellant argued that Samengo-Turner v J&H Marsh & McLennan (Services) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 723, [2007] 2 All E.R. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Marc Spindelman, The Shower’s Return: A Serial Essay on the LGBT Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases, Part II, 81 Ohio State Law Journal Online 87 (2020).Carl H. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Together, they extend the immigrant visa ban and bar the entry of foreign citizens requiring work visas in the H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and many J-1 categories along with their dependents (the June Bans) until the end of 2020. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Together, they extend the immigrant visa ban and bar the entry of foreign citizens requiring work visas in the H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and many J-1 categories along with their dependents (the June Bans) until the end of 2020. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:28 am by Jonathan H. Adler
FLRA, 568 F.3d at 997 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) (collecting cases); see also USPS v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” It will be: “I didn’t lose, no matter what the evil press and the deep-state conspiracy says. [read post]
Foreign nationals who are already physically present in the United States in H-1B, H-2B, J-1, or L-1 visa status, or their family derivative beneficiaries holding respective H-4, J-2, and L-2 visa statuses, are not affected by the Proclamation. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 610 (1952) (Frankfurter, J., concurring); id. at 613 (Scalia, J., concurring). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
In 2008, the AAPS website published an article that condemned Obama’s use of covert hypnotic techniques, which the group traced to Milton H. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Simply stated, if the Mandiant report was not created in anticipation of litigation, then per Judge Anderson, it is not subject to the work-product doctrine protection. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  AMA Provision H-265.993, concerning “Peer Review of Medical Expert Witness Testimony,” states that:[15] “AMA policy is that: (1) the giving of medico-legal testimony by a physician expert witness be considered the practice of medicine, and (2) all medico-legal expert witness testimony given by a physician should be subject to peer review. [read post]