Search for: "State v. Keen"
Results 621 - 640
of 917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:20 am
Mar. 30, 2007) and Keene v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
On 7 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave judgment in seven linked cases, now known as W (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:18 pm
In the unpublished case of Probst v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Div. 1996) Keene Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Morgan: Possibly…What we know for a fact about Lady Heather Mills McCartney is that in their divorce case Paul McCartney stated as a fact that she had recorded their conversations and given them to the media. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
The VCLT rules of treaty interpretation were expressly applied to dispute settlement by the ICJ in the 1994 case of Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), and then by the AB in the 1996 case of United States – Standards of Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline as: ‘the customary rules of interpretation of public international law. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
As Greenwire’s Lawrence Hurley reports, the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Mrs Rabone expressed concern about Melanie coming home for the weekend, but Melanie was keen to do so. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:37 pm
” Keen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:22 pm
So you can imagine how keen the legal world was to get the Supreme Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:03 am
I noticed that one very keen observer of African American legal history (wink) said of the book: From Black Power to Prison Power feels stunningly new—a book about a prison union, which most of us know absolutely nothing about, even though their case traveled all the way to the United States Supreme Court in 1977. [read post]
