Search for: "State v. Penns" Results 621 - 640 of 1,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
Well, we only have two weeks left in the semester in my employment law class at Penn State. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Daniel Ivo Odon, my SJD student at Penn State Law and the winner of the inaugural Mauricio Correa Human Rights Award from the Brazilian Bar Association, has written about the recent Argentine Supreme Court decision in which the court rejected the effort by a prominent model,  Maria Belén Rodriguez, to hold search engines, including Google, liable for permitting the linking of her name and modeling photos to pornographic websites. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm by Daniel Nazer
We think Penn State’s patent would be found invalid under Alice v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 4:56 am
I love it when current events perfectly align with my lesson plan for my employment law class at Penn State. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Schachtman
” In 2010, Justice Scalia, who was a law-review-producing law professor for the University of Virginia for several years, responded to a lawyer’s oral argument, in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Ann R. Klee
Klee’s remarks as the keynote speaker at the Penn Program on Regulation’s annual regulation dinner, held earlier this year at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Ann R. Klee
In and of itself, Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Klee delivers keynote address at Penn Law. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus the court held that Sherman stated a non-categorical takings claim and remanded it to be heard on the merits in District Court. [read post]