Search for: "State v. Perry" Results 621 - 640 of 2,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
In my latest FindLaw column I consider the possibility of backlash against Judge Walker's ruling in Perry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
[AppleResponse] The statute states that an adjudged infringer “shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Laura Sandwell
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 July 2012: Perry & Ors v SOCA, Perry & Ors (No. 2) v SOCA, T (Children), Hewage v Grampian Health Board, RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 [This was a particularly sore point in the Katy Perry case [Katposts here and here], where the Court accepted that since the song had 3.88 million views on YouTube across 6 videos, Perry and could have heard the song. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple damages lawsuit in a couple of years, but in order for that to happen, Epic firstly needs to convince the judges that Apple has violated the antitrust laws.Apple will be represented at the hearing by Mark Perry, who already sported a ponytail at some of the Epic v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
” The ABA Journal’s Mark Hansen reports on last week’s oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:03 am by Marissa Miller
Today’s clippings include further commentary on the Court’s decision in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]