Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 621 - 640
of 71,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2023, 7:39 am
R. 308(f) Identifying an interesting and unresolved legal issue should be the highlight of a judge’s job. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
Precise use of these concepts is therefore essential to properly assess a computer program’s technical contribution. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
District Court Judge R. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
Sepanossian v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:17 am
Using Lady Black’s four-part test established in the case of R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] 3 WLR 1831 (“Stott”), Colton J found that Mr Hilland’s circumstances did in fact (1) fall within the ambit of ECHR, art 5; (2) meet the criteria of “other status” and was protected under ECHR, art 14; however (3) could not be found to be in an analogous situation as his comparators under an ICS or DCS… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
From Kidd v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:19 am
Many people in Oklahoma wonder: What restrictions can the state put on my driver’s license? [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
But as the Supreme Court’s decision in Scialabba v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Adam R. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The Board of Appeal’s decisions The BoA annulled the examiner’s decision. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
R. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeal construed “deliberately” as including “recklessly” and so found that recklessness with both a subjective and objective element, as described in R v G and Anor [2003] UKHL 50, would be sufficient to establish that concealment was deliberate. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 am
R. 27(f). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
” City Hires a Contractor to Complete Repairs; Bystander is Killed In the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision R v Greater Sudbury, the Court was tasked with evaluating whether the entity in question could be classified as an “employer” at the time the events in question occurred. [read post]
