Search for: "State v. Soft"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am
Grabinski speak, he was much more soft-spoken. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:16 pm
Astiana v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Roberto Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:13 pm
v=YZcyMgdWmPg. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
FEC v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
The United States, meanwhile, firmly backed its ally, the Philippines. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Marchand v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
In human rights terms that could amount to failure to respect the essence of privacy and freedom of expression: a power that no amount of necessity, proportionality, oversight or safeguarding can legitimise.Limits on powers v safeguardsThe Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
Beyond the great soft law triumphs of this movement--the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, the ECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and the ISO 14,000 (environmental management) and 26,000 (corporate social responsibility) standards--were efforts to reconsider the fundamental parameters for judging and calculating and expanding a system for embedding business risk in operational decision making in a more comprehensive and normatively significant way. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:42 am
The recent decision of Awalt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:25 pm
In today’s case (Deiter v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:40 am
In an atypical decision, the SJC declared that the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:57 am
In last week’s case (Abbott v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:10 am
Co-author Chance Decker In Barrow-Shaver Resources Company v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:48 pm
In today’s case (Johannson v. [read post]
