Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
A Man v South Wales Evening Post, Breaches of clauses 2 and 6. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm
Skelton to have been acting “in the course of employment”, adopting a broad interpretation of the scope of employment (consistent with past case law: Bazely v Curry [1999 174 D.L.R. 4th 45], Lister [2001 UKHL 22] and Mohamud [2016 UKSC 11]). [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Due to the CDPA not defining what a dramatic work is, Snowden J applied Nourse LJ’s definition of a dramatic work (Norowzian v Arks Limited (No 2) [2000] EMLR 67 p 73). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
Over the last four months the Law Commission of England and Wales has been consulting on the topic of Making a Will, focusing on testamentary capacity and formalities. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
Over the last four months the Law Commission of England and Wales has been consulting on the topic of Making a Will, focusing on testamentary capacity and formalities. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm
This aspect was dealt with again on appeal by the English and Wales Court of Appeal in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as The London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limitedand (2) Ecotive Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1729). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
‘Constitution Bench’ to Decide India’s Data Privacy Future, (2017) 148 Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 28-31, Graham Greenleaf, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:09 pm
A New South Wales Supreme Court jury handed down its verdict on Monday in the Chris Gayle defamation action against Fairfax. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
We also note the treatment by the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board, confirmed on Appeal (see, for example, Cheung's Bakery Products Ltd v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The trial in the libel case brought by cricketer Chris Gayle against Fairfax newspapers in the New South Wales Supreme Court has been taking place this week. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am
In Lockton v Persons Unknown and Google Inc [2009] EWHC 3423 (QB). the court questioned whether it had jurisdiction to make an order against a company based in the United States without a place of business in England. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to… [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
The court’s jurisdiction The defendants were Twitter entities incorporated in Ireland and the United States. [read post]
