Search for: "Strickland" Results 621 - 640 of 2,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
At its March 15, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the scope of qualified research expenses for tax credits, the constitutionality of an amendment to a state constitution prohibiting affirmative action, the effect when a parolee commits new offenses, and Hague Convention standards governing the return of abducted children. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:42 pm by Brandy Robinson, EDMI
  After viewing the issue with the required AEDPA deference, the Court was unwilling to treat the state court’s resolution of the IAC claim as an unreasonable application of Strickland. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
However, all may not be lost because the Court hints at the remaining potential for challenges under the pre-existing Strickland test. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Foster12-420Issue: Whether a federal habeas court must grant Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) deference to both components of a state court’s merits adjudication of a defendant’s Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
Talking of the General Court of the European Union, from the IPKat's friend Piers Strickland  (not to be confused with the similarly-named IP barrister Piers Acland, whatever that court might say) comes a handy note on a recent decision, Case T-444/10 Esge AG v OHIM, De’Longhi Benelux SA, in which that august tribunal held that an OHIM Board of Appeal had properly dismissed an opposition to registration of the word KMIX as a Community trade mark (CTM) for various kitchen… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am by Davidson Stephanie
If you’re wondering what the most-cited opinion in our system is, you may be bemused: With about 10,000 citations, it’s an opinion about ineffective assistance of legal counsel in death penalty cases, Strickland v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
The respondent claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that the ineffective assistance of the petitioner's trial counsel prejudiced the petitioner in accordance with the standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
 They recognized that the test for what's considered ineffective assistance of counsel is not new (Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 6:34 am
According to noted rocket surgeon and local teachers' union president Karrie Strickland, "It is not our responsibility to alter the way health insurance costs, claims and bills are paid in the health care industry in Cincinnati." [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 10:51 pm
The story of Kemp Strickland is here. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:51 am by Cicely Wilson
Terry, US 6th Cir. (2/14/13) Ohio Governor Ted Strickland appointed Steven Terry to fill a vacancy on the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm by Mary Dwyer
Foster12-420Issue: Whether a federal habeas court must grant Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) deference to both components of a state court’s merits adjudication of a defendant’s Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Jon Sands
Thus the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Strickland to conclude that there was no deficient performance here. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:46 pm
NHTSA Administrator David Strickland stated: "Our proposal would allow manufactures the flexibility to design different sounds for different makes and models while still providing an opportunity for pedestrians, bicyclists and the visually impaired to detect and recognize a vehicle and make a decision about whether it is safe to cross the street." [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:46 pm
NHTSA Administrator David Strickland stated: "Our proposal would allow manufactures the flexibility to design different sounds for different makes and models while still providing an opportunity for pedestrians, bicyclists and the visually impaired to detect and recognize a vehicle and make a decision about whether it is safe to cross the street." [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:31 am by Gregory Forman
Strickland, 375 S.C. 76, 650 S.E.2d 465 (2007); not Degenhart v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm
According to NHTSA Administrator David Strickland, the proposal would “[A]llow manufacturers the flexibility to design different sounds for different makes and models while still providing an opportunity for pedestrians, bicyclists and the visually impaired to detect and recognize a vehicle and make a decision about whether it is safe to cross the street. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]