Search for: "UC Davis Law Review"
Results 621 - 640
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
But as one of us, Amar, explained in a law review article over a decade ago, such requirements of party continuity, while seemingly benign, run afoul of the Seventeenth Amendment’s clear rejection of the power of a state legislature to constrain gubernatorial choice. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Bachelder, McCarter & English LLP, on Monday, November 13, 2017 Tags: Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Executive value, Management, Market conditions Reevaluating Shareholder Voting Rights in M&A Transactions Posted by Afra Afsharipour, UC Davis School of Law, on Monday, November 13, 2017 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Agency costs, Behavioral… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
And then you layer on top of that just how densely populated Southern California is,” said Andrew Rypel, a professor of fish ecology and director of UC Davis’ Center for Watershed Sciences. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm
The effect on consumers will depend on how long the inspections remain stalled, said Daniel Sumner, a professor of agriculture economics at UC Davis. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:04 am
See my UC Davis Law Review article for more on this. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
These are the main questions addressed by Peter Lee, Professor of Law at University of California, Davis, in his new article, "Patents and the University," forthcoming in the Duke Law Journal. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
This Court should grant certiorari to review the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Jones also asserts that under state law these elections also cannot be held under after Inhofe has actually retired. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:13 am
” Finally, in response to data emerging from a UC Davis study, in August 2013 the California Senate passed a resolution calling for the state’s companies to have more women on their boards. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Superior Court (Environmental Law Foundation), ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2013 Cal. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
That oath (which, with a few modifications, is the same language the Senate approved in 1798) requires senators to swear or affirm that at the impeachment trial they will “do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:45 am
The other signers include Professor Gabriel Chin of UC Davis (one of the nation’s leading experts on the constitutional law of immigration), Irina Manta (Hofstra), Cassandra Burke Robertson (Case Western), and Erin Sheley (University of Calgary). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
In an article for the UC Davis Law Review, Jane R. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
51 UC Davis L. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
”Given AIRC, it is hard to understand how four Justices would have granted review in the Pennsylvania postmark case. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:38 am
As UC Davis cryptography professor Phil Rogaway has pointed out, even the label “going dark” has a Lakoffian aspect to it, evoking our ancient fear of the dark. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:43 pm
As my 2006 article observed,That superior officers expressed no qualms in 1943 about targeting Yamamoto suggests earlier sources for Stevens’s “humanitarian” unease.My 2010 article John Paul Stevens and Equally Impartial Government (now available in pdf here, and soon to be in print in the UC Davis Law Review) sets forth a story of Stevens's family that might have encouraged careful thought about the power of the state.? [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court granted review before the district court performed these analyses. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Bakke, where the Court found that the use of reserved quotas for black medical students at UC Davis violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, ironically created following the civil war to created to address citizenship rights and equal protection of the law for former slaves in the U.S. [read post]