Search for: "US v. David Green"
Results 621 - 640
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Changing playing fields: the sports attorney’s obligation to learn green. 21 Marq. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am
” In one instance where a lay bench was used – (at Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court) – it was reported that the Bench Chair stated that the court had been issued with a “…government directive…” to jail all riot offenders. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
In Dabson v David Cover & Sons Ltd it was held that the marks awarded by an employer in a selection exercise should only be investigated “where there was an absence of good faith or obvious error”. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Negligence in use or operation of vehicle attributable to owner. 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 3:41 am
Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
FoxNews has coverage of Kagan’s responses to questions about the stance she took on partial-birth abortion during her time in the Clinton Administration, and the Wall Street Journal’s Jess Bravin reports on her comments about political speech, as does David Ingram at the BLT, while the WSJ Law Blog covers the debate on the use of foreign law by U.S. courts. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Gordon, Method and Politics: Morton Horwitz on Lawyers’ Uses of History 8 James R. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
V is for VANOC, the Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee, which persuaded the federal government to pass special legislation that grants it unique powers to guard against unauthorized use of the Olympic marks. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Texas Supreme Court granted review, and by a 6-2 vote, reversed and remanded.1 The majority opinion was written by Justice Hecht, and joined by the Chief Justice, Justice Wainwright, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
David L. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
David Allen Green’s preliminary view was that “In broad terms, this new legislation makes no real difference to the Human Rights Act 1998” but that it will make rights harder to enforce – not least, in our view, because only claimants with very long pockets will be able to take the option of a trip to Strasbourg. [read post]
