Search for: "US v. Davis" Results 621 - 640 of 5,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 5:53 am by ernst
Consequently, they are unconstitutional under the framework established by the Supreme Court in Arlington Heights v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
The family of murdered teenager Bianca Davies is to sue New York officals over video footage. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:56 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
He also noted that Instance v Denny was later supported by the Court of Appeal in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Prudential Insurance Co of America [2003] EWCA Civ 1154. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The dealing requirement performs the valuable function of delineating the degree of connection which is required between the unlawful means used and the damage suffered. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:46 pm by Shea Denning
Johnson, 212 N.C. 566 (1937)); Maintaining a dwelling for the use of a controlled substance (State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, andParadiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. [read post]