Search for: "United Holding Group I LLC"
Results 621 - 640
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 5:49 am
In response to this decision, employers should consider whether any particular group of employees might be most vulnerable to a union effort to target a small group and get a foot-hold. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm
For purposes of health care benefits, self-employed individuals generally include sole proprietors, partners in a partnership, members of an LLC treated as a partnership for tax purposes, and shareholders who hold at least 2% of the stock of an S corporation. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:55 pm
Procedural History"Accenture Global Services, GmbH and Accenture,LLP (“Accenture”) appeal from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that all claims of U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Signal Int’l, LLC, Case No. 08-1220, 2013 U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm
In Specialty Healthcare the Board held that it will find a petitioned for unit appropriate where the unit is made up of (i) an identifialble group of employees (ii) who share a community of interest with one another. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
EXEMPTIONS Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
This is an interesting holding for those who are deciding which issues to appeal, and I’m still digesting how it fits with the recent holding in CERTIFIED EMS, INC. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am
Earlier today, I gave my annual presentation to the Toronto Computer Lawyers’ Group on developments in Computer, Internet, and e-commerce Law. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
In Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:53 am
I hope to hear from you. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Nelson, Capital Mountain Holding Corp., Systems XXI, Act I, LLC, and Systems XXI, Act II, LLCCase number: 09-cv-2222 (United States District Court of the Northern District of Texas)Case filed: November 20, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 6, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-32 SEC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
It was that transferee court that set aside the San Antonio Court’s holding in Gotham I. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:15 am
That brings us to how the case arose, after which we’ll examine the claims in the suit: Richard Schaeffer is the Executive Chairman of Liquid Holdings Group LLC, a financial services company. . . . [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Monopoly Power This author has written elsewhere about The Fantasy Google Monopoly,[6] in which I observed that “the reality is that Google neither acts like nor is sheltered from competition like the monopolists of the past, something the company’s critics never claim because they just can’t. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:20 pm
A little while ago the IPKat's New Zealand friend Ken Moon (AJ Park) wrote to draw his attention to the decision last December in Fisher & Paykel Financial Services v Karum Group LLC [2012] NZHC 334 on software copyright and misuse of confidential information. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Justice Ginsburg then questioned whether cost-sharing between a group of claimants would make any difference: “[I]f I have six friends who bring individual arbitrations, that’s not nearly enough. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Morgan Securities LLC, EMC Mortgage, LLC, Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I, LLC, Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc., SACO I, Inc., and J.P. [read post]
