Search for: "United States v. Arthurs" Results 621 - 640 of 812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 11:03 am by Anna Christensen
Smith, who teaches criminal justice at Michigan State University. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
  In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:20 pm by Jeffrey Andersen
  Some limitations on the expansion of federal preemption, based on a distinction between visitorial powers and enforcement powers, were introduced in the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Cuomo v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Arthur Amaral, 50, of Middleboro, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, 38, of Norton, pled guilty yesterday to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The United States Government, through the arguments of Neal K. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The United States Government, through the arguments of Neal K. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1382 (Fed. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
Slowly, on a case by case basis, the Third Circuit has begun upholding reasonable bans on internet access, most recently supporting a ten-year ban in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Erin Miller
The United States filed an amicus brief in support of Lewis et al. [read post]