Search for: "United States v. Brooks"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
Procedural HistoryThis appeal arises from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:47 am
Relying on the standard set forth by a panel of this court in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Evans to United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm
Another Reason to be Thankful — Energy Poverty in the United States – Philadelphia attorney Linda Evers of Stevens & Lee on the firm’s blog, Smart Grid Legal News NYU Acknowledges Bargaining Rights of Grad Students – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Law Firm Merger Diligence–Are the Financial Metrics Compatible? [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 10:10 am
In Brooke v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:09 am
Brooks, Radio One is correct that D.R. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:58 pm
In Adam Technologies International S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm
Circuit Court, however, in a 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
Brooks, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Diane M. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Minow, Martha. 1998. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:28 am
State of Hawaii, 2013 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The children were granted United States citizenship in 2005. [read post]
