Search for: "United States v. Generes" Results 621 - 640 of 35,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
When Tatel pressed further, Gershengorn seemed to agree that this would doom the United States’s position. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:01 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The Solicitor General yesterday waived the United States’ right to respond to the cert petition in Nerad v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:09 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  The Acting Solicitor General has waived the United States’ right to respond to the cert petition. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:16 pm
The Solicitor General has waived the United States' right to respond to the cert petition in Stephens v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 10:40 pm by Dwight Sullivan
On Friday, the Acting Solicitor General waived the United States’ right to respond to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
Although eight cases came to the Supreme Court from state courts this term, 21 state government attorneys, mainly solicitors general, argued before the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:22 am
DirecTV decision was recently cited by the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia as an alternative basis for remanding a case to state court in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm by A.J.B.
  As the norms of international law change and expand with the times, so to does the law of the United States change with them. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm by Steven Boutwell
Hollowell A recent United States Supreme Court decision handed down in May addressed what occurred when contract, bankruptcy, and intellectual property laws intersected.[1] In Mission Products Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]