Search for: "United States v. Grand Jury Investigation" Results 621 - 640 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am by Susan Brenner
He also noted that the prosecution argued that the fact Mix violated the Hold Orders was relevant to the issue of foreseeability of a grand jury investigation as well as to Mix's motive and state of mind. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Texas the state can't criminalize homosexuality in general.Prison oversight bill in troubleStar-Telegram columnist Bob Ray Sanders says prison oversight legislation (HB 877) is probably dead.Prison YIMBYsSee a story out of Mineral Wells about local officials fighting to keep a private prison unit there open. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am by The Charge
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am by Susan Brenner
That same day, United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun Rice approved the warrant. . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:06 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A grand-jury member allegedly told Lozito that Howell admitted to staying put during the attack because he thought Gelman might have a gun. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
She is the first person to have been prosecuted under Operation Elveden, the investigation into improper police behaviour. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Sentenced to six months house arrest and a fine of $10,000.United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
Your case will mostly be affected by recent published opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]