Search for: "United States v. King" Results 621 - 640 of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
United States, 357 U.S. 301, 313-14 (1958) the United States Supreme Court held that it was unlawful to arrest the defendant on criminal charges when a warrantless arrest was conducted by police officers breaking and entering the defendant‘s apartment without expressly announcing the purpose of their presence or demanding admission. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:05 am by The Law Office of Nancy King
The United States Supreme court last week issued a ruling that requires suspects to clearly state that they are invoking their right to remain silent during interrogation by police. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:57 pm by Robert Loeb, Helen Klein Murillo
The question presented was the military commission’s jurisdiction over extraterritorial charges that had no articulable nexus to the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm by Mary Whisner
And of course, where would Civil Procedure be without Erie Railroad v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
Public domain as a document released as part of a proceeding in a United States Federal Court (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Here at Musings, the contract is king and most of the time, the Virginia state and federal courts will not imply a right of action from a statute that does not specifically create one. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Inside, incessant King v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
However, a majority of the United States Supreme Court did not buy it, and in late 2008, issued its opinion in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]