Search for: "United States v. Lee" Results 621 - 640 of 2,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 12:10 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
United States, 483 U.S. 350) ha concluido que el esquema debe tener como objetivo (Cleveland v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Kimberlin’s Rule 35 motions have also been denied, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
I don’t know if my end-of-April prediction will hold true, but I do expect Neil Gorsuch to become a Justice on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm by David R. Papke
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am
For a United States court to do so was anathema to the principles underlying the First Amendment. [read post]
Of Lee Cnty., 38 F.3d 1184, 1187-88 (11th Cir. 1994) (citing Town of Hallie v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by Nicandro Iannacci
It was on this day in 1965 that the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case about contraception use by married couples that laid the groundwork for a constitutional “right to privacy” in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]