Search for: "United States v. Phillip"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
For example, in Phillips v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm
United States.The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Feldman filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
" See Phillipe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
" See Phillipe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
A pair of sociologists from the University of California at San Diego, conducted a retrospective study of reported prescription medication errors across the United States and found a 243% increase in the number of fatalities between 1983 and 1998 (from 2,876 to 9,856) (Phillips and Bredder 2002). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Rates of C. difficile, the most common hospital-based infection in the United States, continue to climb. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
On March 6, 2012, Timberridge Presbyterian Church of Atlanta filed a petition for certiorari (review) in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:42 am
Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990) in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:01 am
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 812-13, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 1774, 135 L.Ed.2d 89, 98 (1996) (Supreme Court reiterated its position that it was unwilling to entertain Fourth Amendment challenges based upon the actual motivations of individual officers); Phillips v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
In it, Alan juxtaposes some still-smouldering embers of last month's British case law with a cookie that may soon be in the oven in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
