Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 621 - 640 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm by admin
Bellotti (1978), set the legal-ideological stage for SCOTUS’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
A new challenge to the Ninth Circuit test could redefine the key meaning of “waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I agree with virtually every word Fishkin and Forbath write about the imperative to dismantle oligarchy, deepen democracy, and enhance opportunity in the United States today. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 116 (1965); whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequences of overruling and add inequity to the cost of repudiation, e. g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:23 am by Jennifer Davis
SCOTUS April 2015 LGBTQ 54663, Arguments at the United States Supreme Court for Same-Sex     Marriage on April 28, 2015. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[4] The Climate Principles follow other climate-related standards and initiatives within and outside the United States that together reinforce that the public and private sectors are continuing to focus on risks arising from climate change. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]