Search for: "United States v. State of Minn."
Results 621 - 640
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Spam * United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm
From Mashaud v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
However, if the hypothetical alien had been walking in Toledo and the Government could prove that he was an enemy spy who had been inside enemy lines fighting against the United States, and then sneaked into the United States as a spy, he would be like the aliens whom the Government captured in Ex parte Quirin. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
Minn. 2012) (allowing discovery to proceed to identify real parties in interest). [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
COVID-19 is now inside the United States and is not “unique” to one part of the world. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 2011 U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
The cases were In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation, 630 F.3d 622 (7th Cir. 2010), decided in December of 2010, and Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
Minn. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
KMS Investments, 331 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. 1983). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Md. 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/usv-cargill-meat-solutions-corp-et-al. [6] United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
Minn. 2009), aff’d 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” Later, in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
