Search for: "inclusive Does 1 through 20" Results 621 - 640 of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, here is the Senate Judiciary Committee report’s 3,000 word “summary”: ___ This bill would establish the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the Act) to become operative on January 1, 2020, contingent on the privacy initiative being withdrawn from the ballot pursuant to Section 9604 of the Elections Code. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:33 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will be supervised by ICAP's Executive Director and Legal Director. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm by Elliot Setzer
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will be supervised by ICAP's Executive Director and Legal Director. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
”  In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
  We also understood we were many and that we might not like each other or each other’s practices very much sometimes.[1]  We also understood how everyone else saw us. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Friday, November 20, 2020, at 12:00 p.m.: Lawfare Live will host a conversation with Alexander Vindman. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am by Kevin Kaufman
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
  Tuesday, April 20, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.: The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm by John Rubin
Second, the Court of Appeals in Crump compared the felony disqualification in G.S. 14-51.4(1) to the wording of G.S. 14-51.2(c)(3). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
It has to be said that it is not particularly easy to find a clear path through the reported decisions of Chancellors who endeavour to balance the doctrine of the permanence of Christian burial with the understandable desires of petitioners in their various circumstances. [read post]