Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 6381 - 6400 of 40,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 11:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does  not.Under Title VII, the 15-employee minimum applies to private and public defendants. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
We conclude that the water diversion act does not authorize the department's attempts to regulate the plaintiff's excavation activities because those activities are neither diversions within the scope of the plaintiff's permit applications nor properly viewed as effects of the diversions for which permits were sought. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:44 am
  A previous court case brought by Mr Wackerbarth against the same defendant was based on unfair competition claims and failed to succeed.German media now reports of the Cologne Court’s decision (the full text of which does not appear to be available yet....) [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Second Fees Order, at 2 n.1.But the district court did not establish a causal connectionbetween the misconduct and those fees, and it did notoffer any other reason for its fee award. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 8:49 am by Russell Knight
App. 3d 429, 434 (2007) This does not mean that you have […] [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm by Samantha G. Wilson
Just because [defendant] was shown one embodiment does not put them on notice to investigate if distinct technologies might read on the patent which later issued from a demonstration of one particular embodiment. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:16 pm by Sofia Ucles
Although the Defendant contended that the Plaintiff lived at the Defendant’s mother’s house, this does not equate that the two parties resided there at the same time. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 6:01 am
Plaintiff challenged two other statements: "(1) pharmacists violate the law when they dispense [plaintiff's] product in response to prescriptions written for new Foltx and (2) new Foltx is safer and more effective than original Foltx. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:41 pm by Rui Dias
For those able to read Portuguese, two new books have been recently released, as a result of theses defended earlier this year at the Universities of Coimbra and Lisbon. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 8:05 am by Alex Phipps
Turning to (2), the court agreed with defendant that the State did not present evidence showing intent to permanently deprive the victim of his vehicle. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The continuous representation doctrine does not contemplate such intermittent representation (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 9; Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Loft Corp. v Porco, 283 AD2d 556). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Bexis
 The SCA does not apply because [plaintiff] is not an entity regulated by the SCA. [read post]