Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 135,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Does the law strike an appropriate balance between protecting academic freedom of professors and the employer’s right to protect the interests of the university and students? [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm
The inability of these protected groups to speak out for their wellbeing or to take action against predatory adults makes it all the more important for the law to protect their best interests at all times. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:14 pm
I thought the link to the Michigan Bar blog below was interesting. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
It's Monday and time for the weekly round up of interesting posts from my fellow New York blawgers: f/k/a... [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 4:10 am
This is provided for your interest only! [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 3:28 am
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 7:33 am
Interesting article in the most recent international edition of Newsweek setting forth how China might reduce its massive foreign reserve surplus. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 6:09 pm
Why does he do this? [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The typepad spam filter does not seem very effective. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:44 am
The Circuit court’s determination of child’s best interests is subject to review for abuse of discretion. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
I was reading the report from the Senior President of Tribunals (here) and came across some interesting little bits: (a) The President of the Lands Chamber in his report notes that he now has a power to make a protective costs order in cases where there is a significant disparity in resources between parties – does anyone know where this power comes from? [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:39 am
Its one serious fault, from my point of view, is that it does not come with Mac OSX.But it could. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 1:08 am
I hope she does great. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:33 am
The suit claims that when the lead plaintiff declared her interest in a sales position at B&H, and was rebuffed by other employees saying that the company does not hire women for those positions. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
What does all this mean? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
The entire list is interesting, but here are some that might be relevant to lawyers. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:39 am
Yeah, I don’t think so, but let’s explore, because Prince does make an interesting point and he’s kind of right to be miffed, even if it’s for the wrong reasons. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:31 pm
Unfortunately, this program does not apply to those qualifying under the EB-1 multinational executive/manager or EB-2 national interest waiver categories. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:51 am
So thank you for stopping by and I hope you will continue to find something of interest here. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
There is also something very troubling about using NDAs to hide bad facts about a person or a company, particularly when the public’s interest in that information is strong. [read post]
