Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 9,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
The American Bar Association recently held its Ninth National Institute on the Civil False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement ("National Institute") in Washington, D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
, 269 F.2d 221 (D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Cooney is a partner at Venable, a Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
On June 14, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals decided the question in United States of America v. 32.42 Acres of Land, No. 10-56568, D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Other matters to explore include: Did a competitor apply for a “.industry” domain? [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:51 am
AT & T Corp., 15 A.3d 219 (D.C. 2011) and Shaw v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:01 am
After all, in 2009, the D.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Cooney is a partner at Venable, a Washington, D.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm
She joined Technology Review in March 2012 after a brief stint in the Washington, D.C., news bureau of the scientific journal Nature. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
SEC, 573 F.3d 801 (D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:58 am
” There are a lot of legal theories floating around out there, but it just doesn’t matter. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:06 am
And does this matter? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
2 Cases Show “Why” and Offer Lessons – Dallas attorney Keith Mullen of Winstead on the firm’s blog, Lenders360 Tracking the Trolls: A “Twitter Jitters” Update – Alistair Maughanof Morrison Foerster on the firm’s blog, Socially Aware FCC Proposes Changes on How to Pay for Universal Service as Program Shifts to Broadband – Washington, D.C. attorney A.J. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
The D.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
Fortunately, the judge didn’t agree, finding “adequate evidence to prove the hospital was liable no matter what caused it. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
Fortunately, the judge didn’t agree, finding “adequate evidence to prove the hospital was liable no matter what caused it. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
You’ve just savored a scholarly exchange on the D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:33 pm
Whether it’s mattered in practice or not, isn’t this another one? [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
So long as the agency eventually opened a final rule for comment, every error in every interim rule — no matter how egregious — could be excused as a harmless error. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
In the process, the Ninth Circuit simultaneously (1) embraced the D.C. [read post]
