Search for: "People v. Keys" Results 6381 - 6400 of 8,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Optimal policy thinking, then, involves strategies that allow people sufficient control over technologies that they may, in turn, follow their intuition and leverage their experience to increase skills and thereby find meaning and thus emotional equilibrium. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am by Eleonora Rosati
Here's what Kimberley writes: Fanatics about trade mark infringement, cancellation and honest concurrent use in Australiaby Kimberley EvansIn FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC [2024] FCA 764, Justice Rofe of the Federal Court of Australia considered a number of interrelated trade mark issues, including trade mark infringement, honest concurrent use defences, defences to infringement based on registered trade mark rights, and what happens when the registered trade marks on which… [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:03 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Pallante noted that some academics questionedthe strength of moral rights in the U.S. after the Supreme Court Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 11:30 pm by Eric Segall
Yet the people who drafted and debated the Constitution virtually never raised objections to delegation as such, even as they feuded bitterly over many other questions of constitutional meaning. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm by Florian Mueller
So people would get pinch-to-zoom in the form in which they know it, wouldn't notice anything, but the inner workings would somehow be non-infringing. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
  One of his key points, though, was that, for all of the explosion in new media, broadcasting still remains the basic source of information, especially for people who do not want to be bombarded by profanity. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:05 am by Steve Hall
Now those questions will get an unprecedented hearing in the middle of a current murder trial: on Monday, a judge will hear evidence in the case of Texas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
The proposal to have a right to keep and bear arms and to recognize a militia as a key to defense, the Academics say, was intended to embrace a concept of “essential and inalienable rights of the people. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:30 am by Eilionoir Flynn
See the seminal case in this area (Winterwerp v The Netherlands). [read post]