Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2014, 1:34 am
The UT has power (s.25, Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007) to punish such disobedience as if it were a contempt of court (see also MD v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Enforcement Reference) [2010] UKUT 202 (AAC)). [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
” This soft-power push comes as some observers, incl [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
See Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:31 pm
It has a duty to respect the state’s lawmaking power and that means deciding as the state supreme court would (assuming, of course, that the state supreme court wants such deference). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:22 pm
Irving Trust Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm
Lawyers for two same-sex couples in Utah who wish to marry and a married same-sex Utah couple seeking to have the state recognize their marriage in Iowa will be filing papers in the Supreme Court urging review of the new appeal by state officials in the case of Herbert v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
MADD’s underage drinking prevention programs – Power of Parents, Power of You(th), and Power of Community – work in tandem to make the prevention of underage drinking a community-wide priority. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:04 am
Moving to speed up action in the Supreme Court on the President’s power to order the military detention of an individual suspected of terrorism and captured inside the U.S., the Justice Department on Friday asked the Court to deny review of the case of Al-Marri v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan made the same point in her opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:27 am
“As the Supreme Court ruled in 1983’s INS v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
Pink: The case is Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:32 am
The brief, submitted in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 9:19 am
The case also implicates broader federalism questions, such as the extent to which the federal power over immigration is exclusive and the extent to which state police powers may be exercised in the immigration context, as suggested by the Supreme Court’s decision in De Canas v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am
This is powerful stuff. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
CPLR Article 78 expresses a preference that state courts, rather than federal courts, decide a federal litigant’s “state-law statutory-construction” claim Carver v. [read post]
