Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6381 - 6400
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Knaplund outlines several state cases including Jhordan C. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
There are notoriously known marks (6bis Paris Convention) but these fall under 8(2)(c) CTMR, not under 8(4). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
DeFazio et al., No. 12 C 491, 2014 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
DeFazio et al., No. 12 C 491, 2014 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
On June 12, 2014 the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Clark v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Blower, No. 2010-C-2515 (C.P. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:23 pm
This blog post was authored by Sharde C. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:50 am
Key to answering the question of which rights will trump was the 2001 Supreme Court of Canada case Trinity Western University v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
(Photo by Bruce Bennett Studios/Getty Images) From Allianz Suisse Versicherungs-Gesellschaft v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
The Stern v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:44 am
Per the press release:"Our experience at the EEOC has been that so-called 'English only' rules and requirements of English fluency are often employed to make what is really discrimination appear acceptable," said EEOC Chicago Regional Attorney John C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:13 pm
See Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
§ 553 (c)(2)(C). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:50 am
’” [Quoting Paolino v Mace Sec. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
