Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 6401 - 6420 of 7,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2010, 8:10 pm by ZMan!
Original Article 04/30/2010 By pachrismith Sex Offenders and the Willfully Ignorant, part 1 Residency Restrictions I am exasperated beyond expression at the willfully ignorant. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:18 am by ALeonard
  Sometimes I don't listen to something until weeks, months, or even years after it was acquired, so this is not necessarily a list of the very most recent releases, but it does document the order in which I've listened. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by LindaMBeale
  So we might also require banks that create and sell financial products to 1) retain a sufficient share of the interests issued to provide a reasonable equity cushion below the products sold --around 15-20% and 2) not be permitted to "hedge" those products by shifting the risk of loss off to another bank or financial entity. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm by Will Patton
”  The Secretary of State was poised to release the names, when a group named “Protect Marriage Washington” and two individual signatories to the referendum petition (John Doe #1 and #2) sought a preliminary injunction in Federal District Court to stop the release. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Brad Wendel
  John's move is to deny that the law really bans the mailings with the clear windows, and to fall back on (1) prudential considerations -- the Postal Service is going to be pretty annoyed, and (2) the likelihood of sanctions being low. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:03 am by Wendy Fried
”Silly Thing #1: Punching out Goldman for trading "against clients. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:14 pm
That’s unfortunate, for two reasons: 1) Many times, the evidence clearly calls for it; and 2) If such a verdict is returned, it doesn’t mean the defendant didn’t commit the act, and it doesn’t mean the defendant walks away free. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
., holding that federal district court lacked habeas corpus jurisdiction over Guantanamo detainees under existing Supreme Court precedent), rehearing en banc denied without dissent (June 2, 2003), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
" Thus, according to Applicant, the website satisfies the requirement for a proper webpage specimen: "(1) a picture of the goods; (2) the mark appears directly above the goods; and (3) a visible weblink to order the goods by clicking on 'For Foodservice.'"Examining Attorney Justine D. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
History: L. 1978, c. 95; amended 1980, c. 112, § 2; 1981, c. 290, § 18; 1995, c. 20, § 3; 2009, c. 283, § 2, eff. [read post]