Search for: "Label v Label" Results 6401 - 6420 of 13,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
  And now Mississippi joins the growing number of courts that have said Class III medical device claims are preempted, regardless of whether the device was put to an off-label use.The case is Ledet v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:54 pm by Ilya Somin
Part V turns from theoretical to the experiential. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
Practice Tip: A 2006 opinion from the Federal Circuit, AERO Products International, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:41 pm by Jon Gelman
It reversed and remand the case for further proceedings.Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Ronald Mann
As you read that summary, you might be wondering to yourself about the “egregious” label. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
Last year (that is 2012), we named Pom Wonderful LLC, v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Pom's petition, with QP: "Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a private party cannot bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product label regulated under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act." [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:12 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) In September 2012, noted “horror core” hip hop duo Insane Clown Posse sued the FBI seeking to obtain documents explaining why the federal government labeled ICP fans (aka “Juggalos”) as a “loosely organized hybrid gang” under the National Gang Threat Assessment. [read post]