Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 6421 - 6440
of 12,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
(Eugene Volokh) It’s the Gabriel Mobley case, State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
In Matters of Rey v Spinetta, Even if the Family Court had jurisdiction under Domestic Relations Law § 76-a (1) (a), "pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-f, a court of this state which has jurisdiction may decline to exercise it if it finds that New York is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum". [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:41 pm
The application (Herbert v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
A statement that “a purchase will not improve one’s chances of winning. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am
Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
At this stage, it is unclear how many consumers have actually had their cards compromised and used before they and their banks had a chance to cancel the cards and get them reissued. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:37 pm
In contrast, one of the argument to the state appellate court,about not getting a chance to adequately cross-examine the neurologist, seems reasonable. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
It's a long time since this Kat has had a chance to contemplate a legal ruling on parallel importation and over-stickering of pharmaceutical products, so he's delighted to bring you this one now. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
Dulles (1958) or Aptheker v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
But Apple is seeking an injunction that would also cover "any other product not more than colorably different from an Infringing Product as to a feature found to infringe" (which is consistent with the Federal Circuit's TiVo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Memo 2013-281, Bibby v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Memo 2013-281, Bibby v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:04 am
Birla v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
Grewal, known for his work on discovery disputes (including the "Patentgate" affair, which also involves QE) on the Apple v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Under New York federal law, to be relevant and therefore admissible, a physician’s opinion must be stated to a reasonable degree of medical certainty which has been defined as “a greater than 50% chance. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
