Search for: "See v. See" Results 6421 - 6440 of 121,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2009, 6:01 pm
For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:37 pm by Robert
Please do visit our site to see the rest of this post. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:21 pm by SOIssues
Original Article | See Also A misnomer in that actually two Constitutional clauses are involved. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
See Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition §15, p. 142 (1993); Otokoyama Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual employed as a… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual employed as a… [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:37 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:59 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]