Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 3:59 pm
Photo: The Anonymous group adopted the Guy Fawkes mask, a la V for Vendetta. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
In this context, the SEC did an extensive analysis of the pros and cons of access v. private ordering. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
In making that foray, the Commission should have given weight to States' approach toward the rights the Commission claimed to be vindicating. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:15 am
While Williams v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
In a battle between SETH P. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
United States, [289 U.S. 1, (1933)], the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:43 am
• While Feinberg has consistently stated that he will be more generous than any court, this statement has no basis in fact. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
In 1999, Bill Wagner became a plaintiff in Howard v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
According to petitioners, “investors . . . associated with state government and labor unions . . . often appear to be driven by concerns other than a desire to increase the economic performance of the companies in which they invest. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Amicus curiae CalPERS states that it has approximately $190 billion under management, CRI 595 at 2, while amicus curiae CalSTRS states that its portfolio is valued at $135 billion. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
Reasons for judgement were released recently in the case of McLintock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Commenters excerpted a collection of essays by labor leaders and supporters in which one stated explicitly that by submitting shareholder proposals, “unions can gain access to ‘behind the scenes’ meetings with managers” in which “it is commonly understood . . . that unions may discuss labor issues as well. . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Matt started with the sad saga of computer-implemented inventions and the much-pondered battle between the European Patent Office (EPO) and the British courts. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
USPTO Director Kappos has stated that by including the PCT "more work can be shared between our two offices. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Several years back, however, in a case that any first-year law student will also know (the mighty United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
Legal malpractice counterclaims face an uphill battle in attorney fee cases, and Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00267 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department is no exception. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
TenXc Wireless v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
” The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
”The second patent under scrutiny was stated to be “[p]otentially … very important”, as it had been found to be essential for compliance with the 3G standard. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
we received significant comment stating that election contests are distracting and time-consuming for companies, boards, and management. [read post]
