Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 6441 - 6460 of 6,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Another Toomey proposal, which was enacted into law as part of the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act and later codified as 12 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:42 am
, USA Today, Dec. 6, 2001, available at [www.usatoday.com].[22] Fed. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am by Ben
The Conference held a packed main conference session dedicted to the topic and with managers for Mark Knopfler and Muse on the Stage along with representatives from two Collection Societies, and many artiste and songwriter representatives expressed their anger at the practice,Back in July 2015 Music Law Updates reported that Dutch collection society Buma’s practice of rewarding the country’s biggest promoters with a kickback for ‘helping’ to collect the levy on… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Trump, Case No.: 1:23-cv-03773 (civil removal proceedings) Order granting Trump notice of motion to dismiss 2nd Circuit appeal of district court order denying his removal petition in New York (Nov. 15, 2023) Trump notice of motion to dismiss 2nd Circuit appeal of district court order denying his removal petition in New York (Nov. 14, 2023) Trump notice of appeal to 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (July 28, 2023) Order and opinion denying Trump motion to remove and granting State of New York motion to… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
  “Therefore, APHA:” “Opposes legislation or administrative policies that attempt to define the characteristics of valid public health science, or dictate prescriptive scientific methodologies; and” Admittedly, defining good science is very difficult, but the law often works like science as defining health as the absence of disease. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:06 pm by Howard Knopf
It is seeking to charge for all sorts of uses that are simply not covered by copyright law or which are or should be regarded as fair dealing according to the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision in the 2004 CCH v LSUC decision. [read post]