Search for: "People v. Day" Results 6441 - 6460 of 23,466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
  Sometimes, they come up with decisions that are so "novel" that you gotta wonder where they came up with that one.For example, I was reading the Daily Journal the other day and found People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:57 pm by Benjamin Pollard
In the days following the attack, rescue teams saved nine people from the rubble of the collapsed building. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am by ernst
As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case was dismissed on summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals revives plaintiff's due process claim.The case is Victory v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am by Jeremy
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:32 am
A British Columbia Court of Appeal judge has ruled the “impoverished” should not be the only ones exempt from court hearing fees in civil cases and the exemption to pay should be broadened.In the family law case Vilardell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
From February 1990 to April 1994, roughly 14,000-15,000 people died as a result of such violence. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
And Thursday night was an exercise in the people's version of constitutional law. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:15 am
He had his day in court - and he was convicted through overwhelming, and sickening, evidence. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  [Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When the union noticed an unusual number of new, non-union employees at a college one day, it tried to resolve that issue without arbitration, but the dispute eventually went to an arbitrator, who ruled in the union's favor, finding that A&A had hired and rehired these people to perform bargaining unit work, and it did so to save money and to effectively keep them on as probationary employees with fewer rights in the workplace.We have two issues here. [read post]