Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 6441 - 6460 of 14,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 5:10 am
Prosecution of D for snatching Vs purse while both were inside a subway car. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:10 am
Prosecution of D for snatching Vs purse while both were inside a subway car. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:10 am
Prosecution of D for snatching Vs purse while both were inside a subway car. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:07 pm
Prosecution of D for snatching Vs purse while both were inside a subway car. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Educating him out of state was the states version of “separate but equal. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
It is clear from the decision in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47, [2015] 1 WLR 3250 and in particular paragraphs 39-40 that the Secretary of State should have had specific regard to the best interests of children in the position of W as a primary consideration when devising the Regulations. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 3:27 pm by Harold O'Grady
The conviction was later upheld in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
This case involves an Alabama woman who won adoption of her same-sex partner’s three kids in Georgia, only to have her home states supreme court hold that the Georgia courts had erred in applying its own state adoption law. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 10:08 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Brill confirmed “[t]here’s absolutely a path to agreement,” she was less committal as to a potential Monday resolution saying, “[w]e need to get there. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]