Search for: "See v. See"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 121,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 1:40 pm
(…) People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
I don't see the same degree of investment in Texas v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:05 am
” See Slip Opinion, at 18 (citing Hines v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
For additional background, see Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:44 pm
” See Mastrobuono v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
See Tam, 137 S. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212 AD2d 963, 963 [4th Dept 1995]). [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
EEOC, 575 U.S. 480, 486 (2015)); see also SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212 AD2d 963, 963 [4th Dept 1995]). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
See, Linn v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 8:23 am
See Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:59 pm
Patent No. 8,005,303 (Recognicorp, assigned from IQ Biometrix) resulted in an appeal decided on 28 April 2017, which decision was reviewed in this space by Michael Borella, and also criticised (see "Regnoicorp -- A Miscarriage of Justice Calling for En Banc Reconsideration"). [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a memorandum entitled "Guidance on Motions to Amend in view of Aqua Products" (see "PTAB Motions to Amend Post-Aqua Products -- Chief Judge Ruschke Issues Guidance"). [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:11 pm
According to the Appellant's argument, the pay, bonus, and supervisory structure of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board raised at least the appearance that APJs could be improperly motivated in their own self-interest to institute CBMs and other post-grant review proceedings (see "Appellant Raises Due Process Issues in New Vision Gaming and Development... [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:05 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
For instance, in Hobbs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Yes, it’s 2021, and we’re seeing the exact same arguments that failed in cases like Noah v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
in Coccia v Liotti ;2010 NY Slip Op 00917 ; Decided on February 9, 2010 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see some very unusual language from the Appellate Division. [read post]
