Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 6441 - 6460
of 23,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am
By: Frank InghamOn December 18, 2018, Federal Magistrate Judge Scott T. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:36 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 and South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am
Privity is an “amorphous concept not easy of application” (D ‘Arata v New York Cen. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P. 38.1(d). [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Rachel VanLandingham urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
The patent defendant's dilemma in Munich: damned if you do, damned if you don't give up your secrets
23 Dec 2018, 9:59 pm
The shocking part about last Thursday's Qualcomm v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
(Id.)D. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Some like holes in the groundLong v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 10:43 am
V. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
R&S Pilling T/AS Phoenix Engineering v UK Insurance was heard on 13 December 2018. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm
(Supreme Court of the State of Hawai’i, Nov. 20, 2018, Field v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:17 am
Briefly: At Reason’s Hit and Run blog, Jacob Sullum writes that Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[T]he Comptroller is statutorily required to correct errors in the retirement benefits records and adjust payments accordingly to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system,"** citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117 and RSSL §111 [c]). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[T]he Comptroller is statutorily required to correct errors in the retirement benefits records and adjust payments accordingly to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system,"** citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117 and RSSL §111 [c]). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
