Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am
Although O’Connor urged the Court to decide that question itself “for judicial economy,” no Justice seemed likely to agree. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
Judicial review takes place in different forms of proceeding, including suits in district courts by the government or regulated parties and special review proceedings brought in courts of appeals. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
One approach, and the correct approach in my view, was succinctly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Shell Oil [1982] 2 SCR 536 summarizing a long line of English authority: A disembodied idea is not per se patentable. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
There, the court upheld a state amendment in Michigan banning race-conscious programs in public employment, education, and contracting. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:42 pm
Watch v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
After thoroughly scrutinizing the record and given that overt racial discrimination persists in covered jurisdictions notwithstanding decades of section 5 preclearance, we, like the district court, are satisfied that Congress’s judgment deserves judicial deference. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:20 am
” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:12 pm
" See the California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
First: that the district court misapplied the primary significance test and failed to recognize the importance of verb use. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
The district court thus erred in concluding that Nicosia had failed to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
The case first must be reheard in Superior Court, he said. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
On appeal, defendants argued that the district court should have dismissed on grounds of foreign state compulsion, international comity, act of state, and political question. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:56 am
The district court had affirmed the ruling. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Murphy found that two express exceptions to preemption (which could be called “savings clauses”) potentially applied: “First, disclosure may be made through the judicial process. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
But federal and state laws, and judicial doctrines, allow courts to vacate arbitrator awards. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston. [read post]
